You don’t have to be a Marxist to appreciate the fact that few people have ever been so skilled at building polemic arguments as V.I. Lenin.  Consider this passage from his 1915 work New Data on the Laws Governing the Development of Capitalism in Agriculture in which Lenin set out to refute the assertions of a prominent Russian economist of the day:

All these assertions are monstrously untrue. They are in direct contradiction to reality. They are a sheer mockery of the truth. Their incorrectness ought to be explained in detail for a very good reason…

The argument that follows this introduction is as painstakingly detailed and spot-on as required, which is a necessity given the subject matter at hand.  From the caustic polemic follows a methodical deconstruction that is then buttressed by a wealth of relevant statistical data.  The balance of the piece is a resounding quod erat demonstrandum.

Such an introduction to a complex and multifaceted debate immediately compels the reader to accept the infallibility of the forthcoming counterpoint(s).  It’s a methodical attack, meant to undermine the fallacious claims of an opponent while simultaneously and explicitly asserting the validity of the immediate arguments.

This method is among the more useful and effective tactics in both the most simple and complex of political debates.