The blog and contents of the entire greeklish.org site represent the personal views of the site's authors. The views expressed on these pages are the views of the authors alone and are not the views of our employers or of any organizations with which we are affiliated.
Copyrighted quotes and images obtained from third party web sites are used under the terms of Fair Use. Some materials used by greeklish.org are in the public domain.
Family photos are intended for viewing on this web site and should not be reproduced or used elsewhere without the permission of the owners and operators of greeklish.org.
God help me, we are women, and this whole cursed abortion thing is a part of the war on women. Do you understand? Try to understand, because I need you. We have to do it together, women and men, and it's a long road to go."
– Abigail Goodman from the conclusion of Howard Fast's The Trial of Abigail Goodman
But I want to point out that the first step, in my view, is that Roe v. Wade be overturned...I am fighting for an overturning of Roe v. Wade.
– Mitt Romey on the Dec. 16, 2007 edition of Meet the Press
A couple of Sundays ago, I was laying in bed, still half-asleep as I watched Meet the Press. Mitt Romney was the big guest for the hour and the interview was pretty run-of-the mill and boring until Russert brought up the topic of abortion. Romney, who was unabashedly pro-choice until recently, struggled to in vain to explain the sense behind his major about-face on the matter. Even after Russert aired an old video clip of Romney pledging, "I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard," Romney continued to attempt to present his current political line as being largely unchanged from previous periods. Ultimately, Romney told Russert that it was, in his mind, of the utmost importance that Roe v. Wade be overturned as the first means of banning abortion in the US. With that, Romney fell right into line with the other right-wing zealots of his party. (Read the full transcript here) It's not that this is that much of a surprise to me, but sometimes it takes something like this to really impress me as to how much trouble we're really in these days. Romney's comments about Roe reminded me at once of the novel The Trial of Abigail Goodman by the great novelist Howard Fast. I picked up a cheap copy of the book at an estate sale a few years back, buying it not so much for its content but because I recognized Fast's name from previously reading his work on Josip Tito and also from reading pieces of Fast's own autobiography, Being Red. I read the dust jacket of Abigail Goodman on the way home the day that I had purchased it and the plot was rather intriguing as it was a fictionalized account of what might follow if abortion was banned in the United States. In the book, 41 year-old Abigail Goodman, college professor and mother of two grown children, is put on trial in a small southern town after it is learned that she had an abortion. Regrettably, at the time that I purchased it, Abigail Goodman became so much like many other books that I have acquired in recent years. It is certainly a cliche to say this, but as the saying goes, "So many books, so little time..."
Seeing the Romney interview again piqued my curiosity regarding the Fast novel and thankfully, my home library is not in too much disarray, so I was able to locate the book quickly. Abigail Goodman is a short book and something of a fast read. It only took me a few evenings and afternoons to polish it off. Now, I don't read a lot of novels and I really hesitate to put too much stock into a fictionalized "what if" tale, but Fast's work on Abigail Goodman is very good at a number of levels. Of particular importance is Fast's portrayal of American attitudes towards abortion as having specific class distinctions that are, in real life, both painfully apparent and seldom discussed. Moreover, Fast had the foresight to publish Abigail Goodman in 1993 – the early years of the Clinton Administration – at a time in which most dyed-in-the wool American liberals were content to rest on their collective laurels in the belief that our civil liberties would be secure for the foreseeable future. (As if the Democratic Party's neoliberals won't compromise the reproductive rights of women for political gain if it means winning a dogfight with the Republicans...)
Abigail Goodman is, at the very least, a great piece of literature by a wonderful author. In many respects, though, it is a warning to Americans at what we face from the Romney, Huckabee and many others like them. It is certainly a "must-read" for a time in which our civil liberties – and our common sense – are slowly slipping away amidst very little fanfare.
When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.
One of the best things about having friends who are much smarter than you is that just by chatting or corresponding with them, you're bound to learn something new. Such is the case with a recent online discussion in which I have been participating. The premise of the discussion is the question of whether or not the Big Bang Theory (BBT) sufficiently and definitively explains the origins of the universe. Now, I should note that I have never taken a formal course on physics. My college-level science studies stopped at biology and chemistry. The little I know about physics comes from my own limited reading of works by Einstein, Asmiov, and Sagan. I have also read some interesting pieces of Brian Greene's The Elegant Universe. So while the details of the aforementioned discussion on BBT are a bit over my head, the general concepts are not entirely beyond my grasp.
It has been my experience that BBT is generally portrayed as something of a scientific alternative to the creationist explanation of the origin of the universe. But what has been pointed out by some scientists is that BBT itself actually fails to adequately explain certain the premise of the big bang itself. This is well articulated in Dr. Lin Jung Wang's 2005 work "Dispersive Extinction Theory of Redshift" in which Dr. Wang notes:
"There are a number of fundamental difficulties with the big bang theory. First, the notion of having the enormous mass and energy of the universe coming out of nowhere defies every fundamental law and all logic known to physics."
This very simple point is an issue which I would guess has been overlooked many times aver by the average lay person. In fact, the point begs the question of whether or not this particular notion serves as an inherent loophole in BBT which makes the existence of God not only a foregone conclusion but a necessity if one is to ultimately accept BBT as the most viable explanation as to the origins of the universe. With this point at issue, BBT becomes less of a scientific theory and more of a dogmatic belief.
Nevertheless, Dr. Wang continues his scientific critique of BBT by taking issue with the notion of "the expanding universe." The "expansion" phenomena is, in very basic terms, the phenomena of bodies moving away from each other as a direct result of the outward force of the big bang itself. Proponents of the expanding model point to the cosmic redshift as evidence of the expansion and of the validity of BBT itself. However, Dr. Wang's work points to a different explanation altogether:
"We attribute the redshift to the dispersive extinction, which includes absorption and scattering by the space medium...The dispersive extinction by the space medium would cause the central wavelength of a spectral line to shift to the red or to the blue, depending on the characteristics of the space medium."
This is an intriguing alternative to the concept of an "expanding universe." Although the Dispersive Extinction Theory (DET) does not itself present an alternative to BBT, it does serve to further weaken the already questionable foundations of BBT. With time and effort on the part of scientists like Dr. Wang, we are sure to learn the truth someday.
Thanks to my friend Youzhong for helping with this article.
During the Viet Nam War, Buddhist monks in Saigon set themselves on fire to protest the war. The whole world watched as these martyrs for peace went up in flames.
Last Friday, a man approached the "Millenium Flame" sculpture on the Kennedy Expressway near the Ohio Exit, and set himself aflame, leaving a note stating: "Thou Shalt Not Kill." The local media just wrote this off as another unfortunate case of mental illness.
But it wasn't mental illness. It was an anti-war protest. Malachi Ritscher was a martyr for peace. (full story)
Malachi Ritscher (1954 - 2006)
“Here is the statement I want to make: if I am required to pay for your barbaric war, I choose not to live in your world. I refuse to finance the mass murder of innocent civilians, who did nothing to threaten our country. I will not participate in your charade — my conscience will not allow me to be a part of your crusade.”
It looks like the Greek monopoly on feta cheese
is simply not enough to keep their economy strong. The celebrated
cradle of Western civilization and birthplace of reason and democracy,
has now written a new page in the annals of political economy. Under
pressure from the EU because of it’s budget deficit, the Greek
government has come up with a rather...um... innovative way to bring it’s GDP on to a more even par with its budget deficit:
Athens
has announced that its economy is 25% bigger than thought thanks, in
part, to the round-the-clock duties of the country's prostitutes, who
were known as hetairai in ancient times.
The
Greek authorities are revising the country's gross domestic product
(GDP) after deciding that the black market should be included in the
figures.
Manolis
Kontopyrakis, the head of the national statistics service, told
Reuters: "The revised GDP will include some money from illegal
activities, such as money from cigarette and drinks smuggling,
prostitution and money laundering."
Greece's
economic output was €180bn (£128bn) in 2005 and is expected to rise to
€194bn this year. The black economy is estimated at up to €60bn,
according to Reuters. (full story)
Bootlegging and prostitution revenue figures in the GDP? Let’s see if it measures up to what we know about GDP...
...(GDP) is a measure of National
Income. It is the total value of all goods and services produced over a
given time period (usually a year) excluding net property income from
abroad. It can be measured either as the total of income, expenditure
or output.
Hmm...I
guess the bootlegging covers the "goods" end of things. And
prostitution definitely involves "servicing" of one sort or another. But
a proposal like this has to be based on some sort of intensive field
research, doesn’t it? I wonder if Kontopyrakis paid for the research
with his own money or if he used government funds in his study of price
structures, exchange rates, and the like.
At
any rate, the silver lining in Greece’s cloud of vice and profiteering
might ultimately come with an even higher cost at the end of the day.
Not only will Athens have to contend with some unwelcome scrutiny from
the EU over their new GDP figures, they also will face the likelihood
of losing money should their inflated GDP numbers ultimately be
accepted by the EU.
The
country’s newfound wealth raised eyebrows in Brussels, because it means
Greece will find it easier to bring its budget deficit below the
European Union’s 3 per cent of GDP ceiling.
Having
previously been found guilty of underestimating the size of its budget
deficit, Greece’s new GDP calculation will be scrutinised by Eurostat,
the EU statistics agency.
"Member
states revise their figures regularly, but this is quite a significant
revision and needs to be checked," said a spokeswoman for Joaquín
Almunia, EU monetary affairs commissioner.
Mr
Almunia’s aides admit they were surprised by Athens’ announcement,
which was not discussed in advance with Brussels or other EU finance
ministers. Typically, such upward GDP revisions are of between 1-2 per
cent, although Greece and Italy have each previously made big revisions.
[...]
Among
the snags of becoming so much richer, Greece will have to contribute
more to the EU budget and could lose €470m ($597m, £318m) a year in EU
funds earmarked for poor countries after a review in 2010. (full story)
Best
of luck to the Greek government in this new wacky and sensational
scheme. It kind of gives new meaning to the phrase "fetishism of commodities," doesn't it?
Efharisto
-- once again -- to the superior intellect of Antonis, who is the
honorary Minister of Cultural Affairs for greeklish.org.
Have you seen the rivers of the blood? First a trickle, then a flood -- First the ocean's pounding roar, Then a tidal wave hits upon the shore. Knives and arrows fell like rain, And the powder burst aflame, And the flames they flew so high -- Dropped their poison down from the sky.
I had intended to write about something lighthearted today. I
even had a topic in mind. That was until I saw the pictures from Qana
on the news. Though the pictures are played over and over
again, they are no less shocking each time they flash across the
television screen. And the images from Western media, shocking though
they are, are edited in the name of "discretion." A few minutes
on the Internet (browsing independent media sites and non-Western media
outlets) brings the whole gruesome reality of war crimes into a
perspective which is admittedly unpleasant but far more true to
life. The pictures are of the bodies of dead women
and children in their nightclothes, all killed — all murdered — in the name of a so-called "right of self-defense". As if anyone — be they man, state, or military-industrial complex —
needs to be "defended" from frightened children and anxious mothers.
The world should remember today as a day of great
tragedy...and great shame.
Maybe tomorrow the world will seem less cruel and less hopeless. But not today. Certainly not today.
"If I've offended you by this rather mild account...I'm not in the least sorry." -- Edward R. Murrow, reporting on-site from the liberation of Buchenwald, April 15, 1945
This
is the question that I was left with after reading D. Landon’s
June 28 Forum column (“Kim Jong-Il Tries Hand at Texas Hold’em”).
Landon has again proven his ignorance by reducing his analysis of an
impending global crisis to a black-and-white oversimplification steeped
in blustery and nonsensical partisan polemics.
According
to Landon, North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is the fault of the
Clinton administration, part and parcel. Is it that simple? Common
sense and an eighth-grade history textbook might suggest otherwise.
So
how can it be that over a decade after the United States “won” the Cold
War that we are again headed toward a new global nuclear crisis?
Perhaps it is because the people of the world learned some lessons
during the Cold War that aren’t easily forgotten. In 1945, over 200,000
people were killed by the American bombs that landed on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki. For decades, the people of the world lived day by day and
minute by minute with the awareness — and sometimes even the
expectation — that we would die in a nuclear holocaust. In the 61 years
since the nuclear age began, the American nuclear arsenal has
multiplied to such a degree that our country could kill each and every
person on the planet — with or without a good reason — many, many times
over. And during the course of these several decades, the United States
has invaded and occupied countries around the world with virtual
impunity while acting on an agenda aimed at perpetuating the supremacy
of the American military-industrial complex to the collective detriment
and expense of the world’s poor and working-class citizens.
But why should North Korea feel that it is necessary to pursue nuclear technology?
Perhaps
it is because Pyongyang is only several hundred miles away from both
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Perhaps it is because they recall how Douglas
MacArthur pressed for the use of the atomic bomb against North Korea at
the height of the Korean War. Perhaps it is because the President of
the United States has declared North Korea to be a charter member of
the so-called “Axis of Evil.” Perhaps it is because America acts with a
complete disregard for the interests and welfare of others with virtual
impunity and righteous indignation. Perhaps it is because North Korea
can read the handwriting on the wall — handwriting that is written in
the fresh blood of tens of thousands of dead Iraqi civilians. Perhaps
it is all of these things.
I
am certainly not an apologist for the Clinton administration. The
implementation of NAFTA and the failure to develop and implement a
universal health care program proved that the Clinton administration
was no champion of the interests of working people in America. And the
continued embargoes of Iraq and Cuba during the Clinton years proved
that the Clinton administration viewed the suffering of civilians and
children as a simple matter of politics as usual.
But
did Bill Clinton’s failures drive North Korea to seek the bomb? Not
exactly. There’s plenty of credit to be shared by the Democrats and the
Republicans on this one. It’s the drumbeat of American imperialism
heralded by narrow-minded partisan hacks like Mr. Landon that will
distract us from knowing the truth of the matter if we continue to
succumb to their jingoism and partisan rhetoric.
Is
Mr. Landon an idiot or a fool? Does he even know for sure? Well, an
idiot doesn’t know the difference between partisanship and the truth,
and a fool wouldn’t bother to figure it out. So maybe Landon is a
little bit of both.
Monday Night's Countdown with Keith Olbermann featured Olbermann’s most blistering indictment of Bill O'Reilly since their very public feud began...whenever that was, anyway.Last night’s #3 segment on Countdown was a continuation
of the flap over O’Reilly’s baffling comments regarding the WWII massacre
at Malmedy (which was actually O'Reilly's thinly-veiled justification of the Haditha massacre).Although
Olbermann’s previous barbs and spots on O'Reilly have been largely
satirical up to this point (he frequently refers to O'Reilly as "The
Big Giant Head" and "Ted Baxter"),
last night's segment was an utterly
(and justifiably) scathing assessment of O’Reilly's complete disdain
for the truth...And when I say "the truth," I am not just referring the
truth about Malmedy but "the truth" as aconcept in and of itself.While the segment
included archival footage of the exhumation of the mass grave at Malmedy, the most
powerful moments of the spot were the shots of Olbermann himself – who
is often cool and composed – virtually trembling with contempt for
O'Reilly as he recounted the flap step by step, from O’Reilly’s initial misrepresentation of the events atMalmedy to the FOX News revision of O’Reilly’s on-air transcripts to O’Reilly’s half-assed on-air correction (which made even less sense than his original gaffe).
Bill sez: "Ugh. What the hell is wrong with me?"
Perhaps
the most compelling moments of Olbermann’s narrative were
the similarities noted between O’Reilly’s version of the events at Malmedy and
the version of events proffered by Joseph McCarthy back in 1949.The
parallel is not so surprising at the end of the day, as McCarthy and
O’Reilly are fundamentally the same type of demagogic zealots who rose to
prominence through grandstanding and self-righteous fear-mongering.And while one of them has already been consigned to history’s dustbin, the other is surely destined to join him.
Countdown with Keith Olbermann is on MSNBC every weeknight at 8 PM and again at 12 AM (Eastern).If you’re not already watching it, you might want to give it a shot.
Go, Keith, go!
Further Reading Countdown with Keith Olbermann June 5, 2006 full transcript (Malmedy segment is about halfway down the page)
Our
friend “K” has provided a firsthand report on International Women’s Day
in Iran, written especially for our site. His article is
presented below in its entirety, starting with his translation of a
hymn that was sung at the March 8 demonstration in Tehran.
Thou! woman the presence of life,
the time of slavery is finished.
The freedom of women is possible,
our effort is constructing it.
This voice is the voice of freedom,
This call is the outburst of consciousness.
Another world is possible,
This movement is engendering it.
At 5 P.M. on March 8, around 1000 people, mainly the young, gathered in a park in Valie Asr street in Tehran, singing the above hymn. There were people of all ages and sexes, but the
number of women and girls was high. A lot
of activists from workers' and university movements also participated in the demonstration. As
soon as they started singing, the security forces began speaking
through the loudspeaker saying, "Since this get-together is illegal, you
must leave the area."
Noticing that the people seemed to be indifferent as to what was said, one of the officers said, "You
will be given 5 minutes, after that you will be treated differently." At
the same time, one of the girls who was asking the public to be silent started
reading a declaration. Now the officers and civil forces, forgetting
what one of their officers had announced, behaved ridiculously and
started attacking the people.
They beat the people violently, no matter how old they were. Simin Behbahani, a
very famous Iranian poet aging above 70 was attacked while the others
tried to let their bodies be the barriers between the batons, kicks and
the lady. They tried to scatter the crowd, but some young girls sat there and let their bodies be run over by the soldiers and officers while singing the above hymn.
Others, instead of
leaving the area, just turned around. A lot of people being followed by
the guardians had to go through a current of water and left in wet pants and
shoes as a result. The crossroad was blocked for more than an hour. The
crowd was scattered at about 7, while the police did not let anybody
stand in that street or the streets nearby.
It may be interesting and perhaps incredible for many people living in different countries to know that in Iran that Internet sites have been widely filtered as to the word WOMEN and everything related to International Women's Day.
We
again extend our sincere gratitude to “K.” for his assistance in
helping us to understand and appreciate the difficult conditions in
Iran. Further Reading Iran: Police Attack Women's Day CelebrationReuters 09 Mar 2006 Simin BehbahaniBiography and poetry from the Iranian Chamber Society
So...I got a reply, but I am not sure it is what I expected: From: (some guy at WHIO)
Date: Mar 23, 2006 11:05 AM
Subject: FW: writing
To: (me)
Thank your for your feedback.
The story you are talking about was proofed and edited prior to being
posted to the website. It was edited and proofed using the AP Style
Guide.
WHIOTV and all Cox stations utilized a proofing service for their
websites. I questioned the wording of it myself, but the proofer
indicated it was fine gramatically and structurally.
Once again, thank you for your feedback.
(some guy at WHIO) So
basically, it’s: “Yeah, I thought it looked like crap too but somebody
else said it’s okay so we’re not changing it.” Meh. And
note that he says they “utilized proofing services.” “Utilized” —
as in past tense? Maybe they stopped utilizing the service right before
they ran that article, eh?
Oh, and the fellow misspelled “grammatically”, too.
Okay, so greeklish.org is not exactly the pinnacle of journalistic
excellence. But I am also not going around bragging about winning
the “Edward R. Murrow” award, either.
This is just one example of the
high caliber of journalism from the fine folks at WHIO-TV. Lest
anyone out there get the impression that I am nitpicking, feel free to
check their website from time to time and share in the crappy, crappy
goodness.
Despite my best efforts, it looks as though my recent e-mail to Dayton's WHIO-TV
will go unanswered. So I guess I have no choice but to share my
original message with the faithful readers of greeklish.org so I can be
certain that someone has laid eyes upon my gentle critique of the Miami
Valley's leader in local news. (Incidentally, the official slogan
of WHIO-TV is “Coverage You Can Count On.” Shouldn’t it
be something like “Coverage on Which You Can Count” instead? Am I being
too picky?) From: (my account)@gmail.com> Date: Mar 20, 2006 9:49 PM Subject: writing To: 7online@whiotv.com
"DAYTON, Ohio -- Authorities said a woman sitting in a vehicle with a man suddenly catches fire, jumps out and starts rolling on the ground."
Does your station employ any
editors or proofreaders these days? I mean, really…The above
statement is barely coherent. These kinds of mistakes are
repeated time and again on your website and your
newscasts. I am not an English major or a journalism
student, but I know awful, awful writing when I see it. It
would be really nice if you folks would approach basic story elements
like grammar and sentence structure with a bit more care, especially when the subject matter is so gravely serious.
One of the best things about having friends who are much smarter than you is that just by chatting or corresponding with them, you're bound to learn something new. Such is the case with a recent online discussion in which I have been participating. The premise of the discussion is the question of whether or not the Big Bang Theory (BBT) sufficiently and definitively explains the origins of the universe. Now, I should note that I have never taken a formal course on physics. My college-level science studies stopped at biology and chemistry. The little I know about physics comes from my own limited reading of works by Einstein, Asmiov, and Sagan. I have also read some interesting pieces of Brian Greene's 
